Monthly Archives: June 2024

ئاگادارییەک لە سەنتەری زمانی زانکۆی پۆلیتەکنیکی هەولێرەوە بۆ بەشداربووانی تاقیکردنەوەی کۆتایی خولی دوازدەمینی زمانی ئینگلیزی

تکایە بە وردی بیخوێننەوە

ئاگاداری بەشداربووانی خولەکانی زمان لە زانکۆ حکومیەکان دەکەینەوە کە تاقیکردنەوەی کۆتایی ئاستەکان بەو شێوەیەی خوارەوە دەبێت:

یەکەم: ڕێکەوتی ئەنجامدانی تاقیکردنەوە:

١- ڕۆژی چوارشەممە ڕێکەوتی ٢٠٢٤/٦/٢٦ بەشداربووانی ئاستەکانی Beginner و Advance تاقیکردنەوە ئەنجام دەدەن.

٢- ڕۆژی پێنج شەممە ڕێکەوتی ٢٠٢٤/٦/٢٧ بەشداربووانی ئاستی  Intermediate تاقیکردنەوە ئەنجام دەدەن.

٣- ڕۆژانی شەممە و یەک شەممە ڕێکەوتی ٢٩ و ٣٠ / ٢٠٢٤/٦ بەشداربووانی ئاستی Elementary تاقیکردنەوە ئەنجام دەدەن.

 

دووەم: شوێنی ئەنجامدانی تاقیکردنەوە:

1- بەشداربوانی سەنتەرەکانی زمان لە زانکۆکانی پارێزگای هەولێر (زانکۆی پۆلیتەکنیکی هەولێر و زانکۆی کۆیە و زانکۆی سۆران) لە زانکۆی کاسۆلیک لە عەینکاوە تاقیکردنەوە ئەنجام دەدەن.

2-بەشداربووانی سەنتەرەکانی زمانی هەریەک لە (زانکۆی سلێمانی و زانکۆی ڕاپەڕین و زانکۆی هەلەبجە) لە زانکۆی سلێمانی تاقیکردنەوە ئەنجام دەدەن، هەروەها بەشداربووانی سەنتەرەکانی زمانی هەریەک لە (زانکۆی پۆلیتەکنیکی سلێمانی و زانکۆی گەرمیان و زانکۆی چەرموو) لە زانکۆی پۆلیتەکنیکی سلێمانی تاقیکردنەوە ئەنجام دەدەن.

3-بەشداربوانی سەنتەرەکانی زمانی زانکۆکانی پارێزگای دهۆک (زانکۆی دهۆک و زانکۆی زاخۆ و زانکۆی پۆلیتەکنیکی دهۆک و زانکۆی ئاکرێ بۆ زانستە کردارییەکان) لە زانکۆی دهۆک تاقیکردنەوە ئەنجام دەدەن.

سێیەم: تاقیکردنەوەکان لە دووکات ئەنجام دەدرێت کە سەعات ١٠ی بەیانی و سەعات ٣ی ئێوارە دەبێت، بەشداربوانی هەر سەنتەرێکی زمان لەلایەن سەنتەرەکەی ئاگادار دەکرێنەوە سەبارەت بە کاتی ئەنجامدانی تاقیکردنەوەکەی.

چوارەم: پێویستە هەر بەشداربوویەک پاسەپۆرت لەگەڵ خۆی بهێنێت بە پێچەوانەوە ڕێگای پێ نادرێت تاقیکردنەوە ئەنجام بدات.

GOOSE Guarding Behavior Algorithms for Complex Engineering and Science Problems


  • Rebwar Khalid Hamad Mala

  • [email protected]
  • +9647501524517
  • A metaheuristic is a higher-level procedure or heuristic used in computer science and mathematical optimization to identify, create, adjust, or choose a heuristic (partial search algorithm) that can adequately solve an optimization or machine-learning problem, particularly when there is limited computing power or incomplete or imperfect information available. Metaheuristics are near-optimal solution methods used to solve NP-hard optimization problems. Metaheuristics may be used for a wide range of situations because they tend to make minimal assumptions about the optimization problem that must be addressed.

    Due to limitations in time, space, and resources, it is difficult to explore all potential solutions to the many real-world problems encountered. Thus, it is essential to use faster, more cost-effective, and technologically superior techniques. As a result, several algorithms have been developed based on the lives, behaviour, hunting, and self-defense techniques of various species in nature, such as fish schools, krill herds, fox packs, bee colonies, red foxes, and whales. These algorithms are referred to as nature-inspired algorithms (NIAs) because they were developed based on this principle. Considering the abundance of traditional optimization methods, one may naturally wonder why researchers need novel algorithms, such as social algorithms. Traditional algorithms perform well in a wide range of problem types, according to the literature and substantial research; however, they have several significant drawbacks. Traditional algorithms mostly rely on local search and do not provide global optimality in the majority of optimization tasks. Because they often need knowledge, such as derivatives of the local objective landscape, they are typically problem-specific. Multimodal and highly nonlinear issues are too complex for traditional algorithms to handle. They struggle to deal with discontinuity problems, particularly when gradients are required. Because they are often predictable, they have strong exploitation ability, but a poor capacity for exploration and a variety of solutions. In this study, we addressed and improved the above-mentioned problems by proposing a new metaheuristic algorithm.

    The GOOSE algorithm, a new metaheuristic algorithm based on the behaviour of geese during rest and foraging, is proposed. The goose balances and stands on one leg to monitor and guard the other birds in the flock. Notably, the GOOSE method is a particle swarm optimization (PSO) -based approach that updates the location of the search agent with the addition of velocity. The GOOSE algorithm is described throughout this work of art along with an explanation of the idea's inspiration.

    The accuracy and performance of the proposed algorithm were rigorously verified by testing it on various benchmark functions. The GOOSE algorithm was benchmarked on 19 well-known benchmark test functions, and the results were verified through a comparative study with a genetic algorithm (GA), (PSO), dragonfly algorithm (DA), and fitness-dependent optimizer (FDO). In addition, the proposed algorithm was tested on ten modern benchmark functions, and the obtained results were compared with three recent algorithms: the dragonfly algorithm, whale optimization algorithm (WOA), and salp swarm algorithm (SSA). Moreover, the GOOSE algorithm was tested on five classical benchmark functions, and the obtained results were evaluated using six algorithms: the fitness-dependent optimizer, FOX optimizer, butterfly optimization algorithm (BOA), whale optimization algorithm, dragonfly algorithm, and chimp optimization algorithm (ChOA). The obtained findings attest to the superior performance of the proposed algorithm compared with the other algorithms utilized in the current study. The technique is then used to optimize the welded beam design, Economic Load Dispatch Problem, Pressure Vessel Design Problem, and the Pathological IgG Fraction in the Nervous System, four well-known real-world challenges. The outcomes of engineering case studies illustrate how well the suggested approach can optimize real-world issues.

    Comparison of GOOSE statistical results with literature for the welded beam design problem compared to other algorithms such as WOA, PSO, and GSA, where the Goose algorithm ranked third in the list with an average of 3.1882. Also, GOOSE statistics findings are compared with the literature for the pressure vessel design problem, and the method ranks second with an average of (6343.6587) when compared to other algorithms such as WOA, PSO, and GSA. On the other hand, the goose algorithm was used to improve a health problem called (The Pathological IgG Fraction in the Nervous System), and as a result, our algorithm achieved a very good comparative result to the LEO algorithm with an average of (0.00047792). Because this application is newly designed and only optimized by the LEO algorithm, it was compared with the LEO results.


  • Erbil Technical Engineering College

  • Information Systems Engineering

  • Artificial Intelligence (AI) - Optimization

A new Scheduling Scheme in Fog Computing system using Deep Reinforcement Learning Algorithm


  • MEDIA ALI IBRAHIM

  • [email protected]
  • +9647504859569
  • MEDIA ALI IBRAHIM
  • Fog Computing (FC) has recently emerged as a promising new paradigm

    that provides resource-intensive Internet of Things (IoT) applications with low

    latency services at the network edge. However, the limited capacity of

    computing resources in Fog colonies poses great challenges for scheduling and

    allocating application tasks. In this dissertation, an Intelligent Scheduling

    Strategy Algorithm in a Fog Computing system based on Multi-Objective Deep

    Reinforcement Learning (MODRL) is proposed. MODRL algorithm select

    nodes (Fog nodes or Cloud nodes) for task processing based on three

    objectives; current node’s Load, node Distance, and task Priority. MODRL is

    a smart method that integrates the ideas of Multi-Objective Optimization and

    Deep Reinforcement Learning to tackle intricate decision-making situations

    involving several conflicting objectives. This technique is especially valuable

    in situations when there is a requirement to maximize numerous criteria

    simultaneously, even if they do not exactly line, and where trade-offs need to

    be taken into account. The proposed model addresses two main problems; task

    allocation and task scheduling. Employ three Deep Reinforcement Learning

    (DRL) agents based on a Deep Q Network (DQN), one for each objective. It is

    a specific form of Artificial Neural Network structure employed in

    Reinforcement Learning. The DQN algorithm utilizes a Deep Neural Network,

    commonly a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), to estimate the Q-function.

    This enables the model to effectively process intricate input domains. However,

    this is a more challenging scenario because there is a trade-off among these

    objectives, and eventually, each algorithm may select different processing

    nodes according to its own objective, which brings to a Pareto Front problem.

    To solve this problem, propose using Multi-Objective Optimization, a Non

    dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA2), and a Multi-Objective

    Evolutionary Algorithm based on Decomposition (MOEA/D), which are Multi-VII

    Objective Optimization algorithms that can choose the optimal node by

    considering three objectives.

    Simulation investigation and experiments using a Python environment

    with TensorFlow, PyTorch, Pymoo, and PQDM libraries in PyCharm, which is

    a powerful Python IDE, to simulate and train the Intelligent Scheduling

    Strategy. As well as, Virtualized data using MatPlotLib in the Jupyter

    Notebook, indicates that the proposed Intelligent Scheduling Strategy could

    attain better results for the several employed efficiency, adaptability, and

    performance metrics: Task Completion Time, Makespan, Transmission Delay,

    Queueing Delay, Processing Delay, Propagation Delay, Computational Delay,

    Latency, Network Congestion, Throughput, CPU Load, and Storage

    Utilization, with an average value of 2.02ms, 10ms, 25ms, 2ms, 1.0ms,

    9.5ms,3ms, 3.5ms, 0.10ms, %100, %10, and % 99, respectively.


  • Erbil Technical Engineering College

  • ISE

  • Fog Computing, MODRL

Assessing the Impact of Posterior Leaf Spring Ankle Foot Orthosis on Ankle, Knee, and Hip Joints of Hemiplegic Stroke Patients Through Software Gait Analysis


  • Mahmood soran abdulrahman

  • [email protected]
  • +9647508906638
  • mahmood soran master thesis
  • Ankle Foot Orthoses (AFO) are mostly advised for a stroke patient who is complicated with plantarflexion deformity, to promote initial-contact in heel-strike (by restraint extreme plantarflexion position of ankle joint) and provide ground clearance of foot in the swing phase, likewise support, and progress the alignments of the feet for reducing knee joint extension and promoting hip joint extension through stance-phase. The current study aimed to provide deeper knowledge using software gait analysis for the biomechanical effects of PLS AFO for stroke patients.
    42 participants involved in the study divided into 3 groups (the first and second groups were 28 stroke participants that used AFO and with OUT-AFO and the third group was 14 normal participants without deformity. All participants walked 10 meters in a straight line and their gait was recorded at Comfortable Walking Speed. Temporal-spatial and kinematic parameters of the Hip, Knee, and Ankle joints were compared in the study. they were processed using Computer gait analysis (modified Vicon software) and The GraphPad Prism (Version 9.0) program was used to analyze the data. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc Tukey’s test were carried out for comparison among the three studied groups.
    The Posterior Leaf Spring AFO showed improvement in joint kinematics and temporal spatial parameters of stroke patients. greater improvement of knee range of motion in the AFO condition that has better knee flexion in the early stance (from 8.16 to 16.24 degrees with participants using AFO), a huge increase in the late stance of knee extension (from 0.16 to 3.82 degrees), and better knee flexion than the barefoot condition in the swing flexion (from 26.1 for the bare feet to 39.78 degrees using the AFO). AFO can be beneficial for improving joint kinematics and progress in walking speed, gait symmetry, and balance, and reducing the risk of falls.


  • Erbil Technical Health College

  • Physiotherapy

  • Physiotherapy